Showing posts with label Health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health. Show all posts

Monday, 5 August 2024

Coffee and Your Brain Health: Striking the Right Balance ☕🧠

Coffee is a global phenomenon, with billions of cups consumed daily. It's a morning ritual for many, a source of comfort, and even a social catalyst. However, a new study presented at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference 2024 (AAIC) has raised questions about the impact of excessive coffee consumption on cognitive health.

The Research: More Than Just a Buzz?
This large-scale study, conducted by Dr. Kelsey R. Sewell and colleagues at Advent Health Research Institute, examined the relationship between coffee and tea intake and cognitive decline in over 8,450 older adults. The results suggest that those who consumed four or more cups of coffee per day experienced a faster decline in fluid intelligence—a measure of cognitive abilities like abstract reasoning and problem-solving—compared to those who drank coffee moderately or not at all.
Key Findings:
 * High Coffee Consumption: Associated with the steepest decline in fluid intelligence over the study period.
 * Moderate Coffee Consumption: May offer some protection against cognitive decline.
 * No Coffee Consumption: Showed slower decline in fluid intelligence compared to high consumption but not as slow as moderate consumption.
The Caffeine Conundrum: How Much is Too Much?
Caffeine, the primary stimulant in coffee, has been linked to various health effects, both positive and negative. While moderate caffeine intake has been associated with improved alertness, focus, and even reduced risk of some diseases, excessive consumption can lead to anxiety, sleep disturbances, and potentially, accelerated cognitive decline as this study suggests.
Recommended Caffeine Intake:
 * The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) suggests a maximum of 400 milligrams (mg) of caffeine per day for healthy adults, which is roughly equivalent to four cups of coffee.
 * However, individual sensitivity to caffeine varies, and some people may experience adverse effects with lower amounts.
Brewing a Balanced Approach
While this study raises concerns about excessive coffee consumption, it's important to note that it doesn't necessarily mean you need to ditch your daily coffee routine altogether. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of moderation and finding the right balance for your individual needs.
Tips for Moderating Coffee Intake:
 * Track Your Consumption: Be mindful of how many cups of coffee you're drinking per day.
 * Switch to Decaf: Consider alternating between regular and decaf coffee.
 * Explore Tea: This study found that tea consumption, even in large amounts, was not associated with accelerated cognitive decline.
 * Listen to Your Body: Pay attention to how caffeine affects you personally and adjust your intake accordingly.
The Bottom Line: Coffee in Moderation
Coffee, like many things in life, can be enjoyed in moderation as part of a healthy lifestyle. However, it's crucial to be aware of the potential risks associated with excessive consumption, especially as we age. By making informed choices and listening to our bodies, we can continue to enjoy the benefits of coffee without compromising our cognitive health.
Disclaimer: This blog post is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider regarding any concerns about your caffeine intake or cognitive health.

Friday, 3 May 2024

Boosting Brain Power: Can Brain Training Really Enhance Cognitive Function?

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1LnjIegDlIXtsRj_xwj2ywVJuMgls3hlH
In a world where mental sharpness is as prized as physical health, the allure of brain training programs promising enhanced cognitive functions and a shield against decline is understandably compelling. The question, however, remains: do these brain exercises truly live up to their claims?

The Science Behind Brain Training
Brain training, often encapsulated in tasks designed to boost various cognitive abilities, has surged in popularity over recent years. According to Yuko Hara, PhD, from the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, these activities are geared towards fortifying specific cognitive functions through repeated practice.

Dr. Manuel Montero-Odasso from the Gait and Brain Lab emphasizes that such cognitive training hinges on intensifying attentional demands to bolster focus, memory, and concentration. This is achieved through neuroplasticity—the brain's remarkable ability to form new synaptic connections. Essentially, engaging in new cognitive activities can potentially stimulate the brain's frontal regions, fostering new neural pathways.
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1PkV6q1IjwJI-nupfnmJhsghowxm_DyQd
Neuroplasticity involves the formation of new neural connections in response to learning or experience.

Does It Really Work?
The notion that these exercises can build a "cognitive reserve" to delay or even prevent conditions like Alzheimer's is supported by some neuroscientists, including Michael Merzenich, PhD, a professor emeritus at the University of California, San Francisco. Merzenich suggests that a combination of brain training and physical exercise could be crucial in managing brain health.

However, the effectiveness of brain training programs has been a hotbed of debate. While some studies show that these exercises can improve performance on specific tasks, the transfer of these enhancements to daily cognitive functions or the broader prevention of cognitive decline remains uncertain. Critics argue that improvements in task performance may not necessarily translate into real-world benefits, pointing to the need for more comprehensive and clinically rigorous studies.

Henry Mahncke, PhD, CEO of Posit Science, argues that effective brain training should focus on reducing the "cognitive noise" or inefficiencies that increase with age. By refining the brain's processing speed and accuracy, these programs can potentially rejuvenate cognitive functions.

What Does the Research Say?
Noteworthy among the body of research is the ACTIVE study, which indicated that certain types of cognitive training could reduce the risk of dementia. Participants who engaged in speed-of-processing training displayed significantly lower dementia incidence compared to those who received no training.

Additionally, the SYNERGIC study led by Montero-Odasso found that combining physical exercise with cognitive training significantly improved cognitive scores among older adults with mild cognitive impairment, suggesting a synergistic effect of multi-domain interventions.

Beyond Formal Programs
It's not just about formal training programs. Engaging in a variety of mentally stimulating activities like puzzles, learning new skills, or even social dancing can also contribute to cognitive health. The novelty and challenge of these activities can stimulate the brain and possibly delay cognitive decline.

The Verdict
So, does brain training work? The answer is nuanced. While there's evidence supporting the benefits of specific brain training interventions, the general consensus suggests a more measured approach. The effectiveness of brain training might depend significantly on the type of activity, its intensity, and the individual's baseline cognitive function.

For those interested in exploring brain training, it may be worthwhile as one component of a holistic approach to cognitive health that also includes physical exercise, a healthy diet, and social engagement.

As we continue to unravel the complexities of the human brain, what's clear is the potential of our grey matter to adapt and evolve. Whether through high-tech apps or traditional puzzles, nurturing our cognitive abilities is undeniably a wise investment in our future mental health.

Navigating the Future of Brain Health
As research continues to evolve, the pursuit of maintaining and enhancing brain function through cognitive exercises remains a dynamic and promising field. The intersection of technology and neuroscience offers unprecedented opportunities to innovate and refine brain training methodologies. Future studies and technological advancements are likely to deepen our understanding of how to most effectively engage our brains in meaningful ways.

Integrating Brain Training into Everyday Life
For those eager to integrate brain training into their daily routine, the approach should be balanced and varied. Here are a few practical tips:
1. Diversify Your Activities: Engage in different types of cognitive exercises to challenge various parts of your brain. This could include a mix of memory games, problem-solving tasks, and puzzles.
2. Consistency is Key: Regular practice is crucial. Just as with physical exercise, the benefits of brain training accumulate over time.
3. Combine Mental and Physical Exercise: Incorporate physical activities that also require mental engagement, such as yoga, dancing, or team sports, which can enhance cognitive function and overall health.
4. Stay Social: Engage in social activities that challenge your brain. Book clubs, group learning, and social gatherings stimulate conversation and cognitive skills.
5. Monitor Your Progress: Use apps or journals to track your progress. Monitoring improvements can motivate you to stick with your brain training regimen.

Ethical and Commercial Considerations
As brain training becomes more commercialized, it's essential to approach these tools with a critical eye. Consumers should be wary of claims that seem too good to be true and seek programs that have robust scientific backing. Transparency about the benefits and limitations of these tools, as provided by reputable sources, will be crucial for informed decision-making.

The Role of Healthcare Providers
Healthcare providers can play a significant role in guiding patients through the maze of brain health options. By staying informed about the latest research and understanding the individual needs of their patients, clinicians can recommend the most appropriate and effective strategies for maintaining cognitive health.

Looking Ahead
The journey to unlocking the full potential of our cognitive capabilities is ongoing. With continued research, innovation, and public interest, the future of brain training holds exciting possibilities. Whether it's through sophisticated software or simple daily activities, the goal remains the same: to keep our minds sharp and resilient as we age.

In conclusion, while brain training alone is not a magic bullet for preventing cognitive decline, it represents a promising piece of the puzzle. When combined with a healthy lifestyle and active social engagement, it has the potential to contribute significantly to our cognitive longevity and quality of life.

Stay tuned for more insights and updates on cognitive health at MyRationalThoughts.com (https://www.myrationalthoughts.com). Join the conversation and share your experiences with brain training in the comments below or on our social media platforms. Together, let's explore the fascinating world of brain health and push the boundaries of what our minds can achieve!

Sunday, 24 December 2023

Eat Carrots and Prevent Cancer: Unveiling the Superfood's Hidden Powers

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1BLcCLldQJer0cfPQjlx0QWTnMWVf9CUL
Harnessing the Power of Carrots: A Bite into Cancer Prevention
In a world constantly seeking natural ways to combat illness, a recent meta-analysis led by Kirsten Brandt of Newcastle University, published by Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, brings to light the cancer-fighting properties of a familiar vegetable: the humble carrot.

Carrots: More Than Just a Crunchy Snack
The study's in-depth analysis of 50 prospective cohort studies, involving 52,000 cancer cases, reveals a striking correlation between carrot consumption and reduced cancer risk. Spanning various cancer types and geographical regions, the findings suggest that carrots cut cancer risk by 10%-20%.

The Science Behind the Orange Crunch
Carrots are known for their high beta-carotene content. However, this study focused on another compound, alpha-carotene, due to limited cancer reduction benefits seen in previous studies on beta-carotene. Remarkably, alpha-carotene levels, as measured in plasma in 30 prospective cohorts with 9,331 cancer cases, showed a relative risk reduction of 20% in cancer.

A Serving a Week Keeps the Doctor Away
The study highlights a significant linear dose-response relationship. Consuming just one serving of carrots per week can reduce cancer risk by 4±2%, while five servings can slash the risk by 20±10%. This finding underlines the practicality and accessibility of carrots as a dietary choice for cancer prevention.

A Robust Inverse Association
The authors describe the inverse relationship between carrot intake and cancer risk as “robust,” advocating for the encouragement of carrot consumption. They also call for further research into the causal mechanisms through randomised clinical trials, which could offer deeper insights into how carrots combat cancer.

Methodology and Limitations
The meta-analysis compiled data from a wide array of studies, considering different cancer types, geographic regions, and exposure types. However, it's crucial to note that all included studies were observational, not randomised clinical trials. This factor presents a limitation in definitively establishing causality between carrot intake and reduced cancer risk.

In Practice: Integrating Carrots into Daily Diets
This study's findings present a compelling case for integrating carrots into our daily diets. As a versatile and widely available vegetable, carrots can easily be incorporated into meals, offering both flavor and health benefits.

A Step Forward in Cancer Prevention
The study, funded by the Agricultural and Horticultural Board, UK, among others, stands as a testament to the potential of natural food sources in disease prevention. It paves the way for future research and reinforces the importance of a balanced, vegetable-rich diet in maintaining health and preventing illness.

Conclusion: Embracing Carrots for Health
As we navigate an era where lifestyle diseases are prevalent, simple, evidence-based dietary changes like increasing carrot intake can have profound health impacts. The study not only highlights the cancer-fighting potential of carrots but also serves as a reminder of the power of natural foods in preserving our health. So, the next time you're at the grocery store, remember to stock up on carrots - your body might just thank you for it.
Reference: 

Wednesday, 15 November 2023

The Link Between Sleep and Dementia Risk: A Wake-Up Call

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1eoahDo6jW4HHss-aRH-WDqHS6jrgT4iw
In our fast-paced lives, sleep often falls down our list of priorities, but recent research from Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, is a stark reminder of its critical importance, especially deep sleep. A retrospective cohort study, published in JAMA Neurology, reveals a compelling link between the loss of deep sleep and an increased risk of dementia, particularly Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

The Study: A Deep Dive into Sleep and Dementia
The study hinged on participants from the renowned Framingham Heart Study, focusing on a subset aged 60 or over. These individuals underwent two polysomnographic sleep studies between 1995-1998 and 2001-2003. They were then monitored until 2018 for signs of dementia.

What sets this study apart is its meticulous methodology. Participants were assessed not just for sleep patterns but also for genetic predispositions to Alzheimer's. This comprehensive approach sheds light on the intricate interplay between our genetics, our sleep, and our brain health.

The Findings: A Startling Association
The results are alarming yet informative. Over an average of 12 years after the second sleep study, 52 of the 346 participants developed dementia, with 44 of these cases being Alzheimer's. The startling revelation was that each percentage decrease in Slow-Wave Sleep (SWS), or deep sleep, per year corresponded to a 27% increase in all-cause dementia risk and a 32% increase in the risk for Alzheimer's.

These findings point towards the critical role of SWS in brain health. As lead investigator Dr. Matthew Pase notes, "Slow-wave sleep, or deep sleep, supports the ageing brain in many ways, including the clearance of metabolic waste." This is particularly significant in the context of Alzheimer's, where the failure to clear certain proteins is a hallmark of the disease.

 The Implications: A Modifiable Risk Factor
This research is a wake-up call, highlighting SWS loss as a potentially modifiable dementia risk factor. It suggests that by prioritizing deep sleep in our later years, we could significantly lower our risk of dementia. 

 In Practice: What Can We Do?
While there are limitations to the study, such as the absence of gold-standard AD biomarkers and its observational nature, the implications are too significant to ignore. Enhancing the quality of our sleep, particularly deep sleep, could be a key strategy in mitigating dementia risk.

 Final Thoughts
In an age where sleep is often sacrificed at the altar of productivity, this study is a crucial reminder of its importance. It's not just about the quantity of sleep but the quality, particularly the deep, restorative stages that could hold the key to our cognitive well-being in our later years. As we understand more about the links between sleep and dementia, perhaps it's time to re-evaluate our sleep habits and give our brains the rest they deserve.

Monday, 31 July 2023

Snoring Could Be Harming Your Brain

Snoring and Your Brain: What the Nightly Rumble May Mean for Your Brain Health

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1z1TKxNyOzBEqWVnAGYEKuIuM-eWe8AfT

Do you snore, or know someone who does? While it may be a source of light-hearted teasing or frustration within a family, the implications of snoring could be far more serious than we think. Recent research from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Paris-Cité suggests that habitual snorers might be fast-forwarding the aging process of their brains and inadvertently compromising their brain health.

The underlying factor in the harm caused by snoring is the deprivation of deep sleep, the phase of sleep crucial for physical and mental restoration. The study finds that the regular, loud snorers with obstructed breathing, often the tell-tale signs of sleep apnea, stand at higher risk of developing symptoms of grave conditions like stroke, Alzheimer's disease, or general cognitive decline. 

The evidence for this alarming theory lies in the presence of tiny lesions on the brain, known as white matter hyperintensities. These biomarkers give an indication of the brain's health status and are more prevalent with age or uncontrolled high blood pressure. However, these lesions appeared more abundantly in participants with severe sleep apnea compared to those with mild or moderate conditions. This suggests a correlation between the severity of sleep-disordered breathing and the state of the brain's health.

Astonishingly, the study found that for every 10% decrease in deep sleep, there was an increase in these white matter hyperintensities, equivalent to the brain aging 2.3 years. This process signifies a decrease in the integrity of the axons, the elongated part of a nerve cell that allows communication between cells. Alarmingly, the same 10% reduction of deep sleep was also associated with reducing the integrity of these axons, leading to an effect similar to the brain appearing 3 years older.

This groundbreaking research emphasises the importance of quality sleep and paints a grim picture of the potential implications of untreated snoring. However, as the understanding of the relationship between snoring, deep sleep, and brain health continues to evolve, individuals have the opportunity to take control of their sleep health.

So, if you or a loved one is a chronic snorer, consider seeking professional medical advice. Simple lifestyle changes, or in more severe cases, medical interventions, could not only lead to quieter nights but also contribute significantly to preserving your cognitive health. In essence, protecting your sleep could mean protecting your brain, and that's something worth losing a little sleep over.

Saturday, 22 April 2023

The New Obesity Breakthrough Drugs

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1QY44lhbkX9y0uoTlNntfeOg_9aFSTw6B

There are many holy grails in medicine, with failure after failure, like finding a way to prevent Alzheimer's disease or a non-invasive means for accurately measuring ambulatory blood pressure. But one of the biggest and most daunting has been finding drugs that can tackle obesity — achieving a substantial amount of weight loss without serious side effects. Many attempts to get there now fill a graveyard of failed drugs, such as fen-phen in the 1990s when a single small study of this drug combination in 121 people unleashed millions of prescriptions, some leading to serious heart valve lesions that resulted in withdrawal of the drug in 1995. The drug rimonabant, an endocannabinoid receptor blocker (think of blocking the munchies after marijuana) looked encouraging in randomized trials. However, subsequently, in a trial that I led of nearly 19,000 participants in 42 countries around the world, there was a significant excess of depression, neuropsychiatric side-effects and suicidal ideation which spelled the end of that drug's life.

 

In the United States, where there had not been an anti-obesity drug approved by the FDA since 2014, Wegovy (semaglutide), a once-weekly injection was approved in June 2021. The same drug, at a lower dose, is known as Ozempic (as in O-O-O, Ozempic, the ubiquitous commercial that you undoubtedly hear and see on TV) and had already been approved in January 2020 for improving glucose regulation in diabetes. The next drug on fast track at FDA to be imminently approved is tirzepatide (Mounjaro) following its approval for diabetes in May 2022. It is noteworthy that the discovery of these drugs for weight loss was serendipitous: they were being developed for improving glucose regulation and unexpectedly were found to achieve significant weight reduction.

Both semaglutide and tirzepatide underwent randomized, placebo-controlled trials for obesity, with marked reduction of weight as shown below. Tirzepatide at dose of 10 to 15 mg per week achieved >20% body weight reduction. Semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg achieved ~17% reduction. These per cent changes in body weight are 7-9 fold more than seen with placebo (2-3% reduction). Note: these levels of per cent body weight reduction resemble what is typically achieved with the different types of bariatric surgery, such as gastric bypass.

 https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1ZlJgSm2f8c4TGFTztQueJ4m9mgh-JvC7


Another way to present the data for the 2 trials is shown here, with an edge for tirzepatide at high (10-15 mg) doses, extending to >25% body weight reduction.

 

 https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1_UND3vq9gu4HXTLzsgDgAmjbBQ8DTF9U

The results with semaglutide were extended to teens in a randomized trial (as shown below), and a similar trial with tirzepatide is in progress.

 https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1uyIrQH6LS3AgZ6e5H8CtxzVyXYLLwjm-


How Do These Drugs Work?

 

These are peptides in the class of incretins, mimicking gut hormones that are secreted after food intake which stimulate insulin secretion.

 https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1umrt_61ViSDZGGSHYDQX0XdZNdaJtC0S


These 2 drugs have in common long half-lives (~ 5 days), which affords once-weekly dosing, but have different mechanisms of action. Semaglutide activates (an agonist) the GLP-1 receptor, while tirzepatide is in a new class of dual agonists: it activates (mimics) both the GLP-1 receptor and GIP receptors (Gastric inhibit polypeptide is also known as glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide.) The potency of activation for tirzepatide is 5-fold more for GIPR than GLP1. As seen below, there are body wide effects that include the brain, liver, pancreas, stomach, intestine, skeletal muscle and fat tissue. While their mode of action is somewhat different, their clinical effects are overlapping, which include enhancing satiety, delaying gastric emptying, increasing insulin and its sensitivity, decreasing glucagon, and, of course, reducing high glucose levels. The overlap extends to side effects of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation and diarrhea. Yet only 4 to 6% of participants discontinued the drug in these trials, mostly owing to these GI side effects (and 1-2% in the placebo group discontinued the study drug for the same reasons).

In randomized trials among people with Type 2 diabetes, the drugs achieved HbA1c reduction of at least an absolute 2 percentage points which led to their FDA approvals (For semaglutide in January 2020, and for tirzepatide in May 2022). The edge that tirzepatide has exhibited for weight loss reduction may be related to its dual agonist role, but the enhancement via GIP receptor activation is not fully resolved (as seen below with GIP? designation). The Amgen drug in development (AMG-133) has a marked weight loss effect but inhibits GIP rather than mimics it, clouding our precise understanding of the mechanism.

 https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1P0vEd8zA8KgSSYsrGYUb4U0IXKql0MDL

The gut-brain regulation of food intake with the many gut hormones (including leptin, gherlin, PYY, amylin) and targets in the body and brain regions. From Muller et al, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery March 2022. 


Nevertheless, when the two drugs were directly compared in a randomized trial for improving glucose regulation, tirzepatide was superior to semaglutide, as shown below. Of note, both drugs achieved very favorable effects on lipids, reducing triglycerides, LDL and raising HDL cholesterol, along with reduction of blood pressure, an outgrowth of the indirect effect of weight reduction and direct metabolic effects of the drugs.

 https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=10axmmVFiL90sf5DWTzZXEWsGN7RUYbBu

While there has been a concern about other side effects besides the GI ones noted above, review of all the trials to date in these classes of medication do not reinforce a risk of acute pancreatitis. Other rare side effects that have been noted with these drugs include allergic reactions, gallstones (which can occur with a large amount of weight loss), and potential of medullary thyroid cancer (so far only documented in rats, not people), which is why they are contraindicated in people with Type 2 multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome.


How They Are Given and Practical Considerations

 

For semaglutide, which has FDA approval, the indication is a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater than 27 kg/m2 and a weight related medical condition (such as hypertension. hypercholesterolemia or diabetes). To reduce the GI side effects, which mainly occur in the early dose escalation period, semaglutide is given in increasing doses by a prefilled pen by self-injection under the skin (abdomen, thigh or arm) starting at 0.25 mg for a month and gradual increases each month reaching the maximum dose of 2.4 mg at month 5. The FDA label for dosing of tirzepatide has not been provided yet but in the weight loss trial there was a similar dose escalation from 2.5 mg up to 15 mg by month 5. The escalation is essential to reduce the frequent GI side effects, such as seen below in the tirzepatide trial.

 https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=1Ez9Rl6xpRWT9t6juU5w1x-DI4UkK1mal

Semaglutide is very expensive, ~$1500 per month, and not covered by Medicare. There are manufacturer starter coupons from Novo Nordisk, but that is just for the first month. These drugs have to be taken for a year to 18 months to have their full effect and without changes in lifestyle that are durable, it is likely that weight will be regained after stopping them.


What Does This Mean?

 

More than 650 million adults are obese and 13% of the 8 billion world's population (including over 340 million ages 5-18) is obese — that sums us to over 1 billion people. The global obesity epidemic has been relentless, worsening each year, and a driver of "diabesity," the combined dual epidemic. We now have a breakthrough class of drugs that can achieve profound weight loss equivalent to bariatric surgery, along with the side benefits of reducing cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension and hyperlipidemia), improving glucose regulation, reversing fatty liver, and the many detrimental long-term effects of obesity such as osteoarthritis and various cancers. That, in itself, is remarkable. Revolutionary.

 

But the downsides are also obvious. Self-injections, even though they are once a week, are not palatable for many. We have seen far more of these injectables in recent years such as the PCSK-9 inhibitors for hypercholesterolemia or the TNF blockers for autoimmune conditions. That still will not make them a popular item for such an enormous population of potential users.


That brings me to Rybelsus, the oral form of semaglutide, which is approved for glucose regulation improvement but not obesity. It effects for weight loss have been modest compared to Wegovy (5 to 8 pounds for the 7 and 14 mg dose, respectively). But the potential for the very high efficacy of an injectable to be achievable via a pill represents an important path going forward—it could help markedly reduce the cost and uptake.


The problem of discontinuation of the drugs is big, since there are limited data and the likelihood is that the weight will be regained unless there are substantial changes in lifestyle. We know how hard it is to durably achieve such changes, along with the undesirability (and uncertainty with respect to unknown side-effects) of having to take injectable drugs for many years, no less the cost of doing that.


The cost of these drugs will clearly and profoundly exacerbate inequities, since they are eminently affordable by the rich, but the need is extreme among the indigent. We've already seen celebrities take Wegovy for weight loss who are not obese, a window into how these drugs can and will be used without supportive data. As one physician recently observed, "Other than Viagra and Botox, I've seen no other medication so quickly become part of modern culture's social vernacular." Already there are concerns that such use is preventing access to the drugs for those who qualify and need them.

 

There are multiple agents in the class under development which should help increase competition and reduce cost, but they will remain expensive. There is private insurance reimbursement, often with a significant copay, for people who tightly fit the inclusion criteria. Eventual coverage by Medicare will markedly expand their use, and we can expect cost-effectiveness studies to be published showing how much saving there is for the drugs compared with bariatric surgery or not achieving the weight loss. But that doesn't change the cost at the societal level. Even as we've seen with generics, which will ultimately be available, the alleviation of the cost problem isn't what we'd hoped.

 

This is not unlike the recent triumphs of gene therapy, as in $3.5 million for a cure of hemophilia that just got FDA approval, but instead of a rare disease we are talking about the most common medical condition in the world. We finally get across the long sought after (what many would qualify as miraculous) goal line, but the economics collide with the uptake and real benefit.

 

These concerns can't be put aside in the health inequity-laden world we live in, that will unquestionably be exacerbated. However, we cannot miss that this represents one of the most important, biggest medical breakthroughs in history. This may signify the end or marked reduction in the need for bariatric surgery. These drugs will likely become some of the most prescribed of all medications in the upcoming years. While there are many drawbacks, we shouldn't miss such an extraordinary advance in medicine—the first real, potent and safe treatment of obesity.

Thursday, 20 April 2023

Intermittent Fasting Plus Early Eating May Prevent Type 2 Diabetes

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=view&id=16AGzdRq_5KkSpt793GXJYVKziR5bKfWJ

Individuals at increased risk of type 2 diabetes may be able to reduce their risk via a novel intervention combining intermittent fasting (IF) with early time-restricted eating, indicate the results of a randomized controlled trial.

The study involved more than 200 individuals randomized to one of three groups: eat only in the morning (from 8:00 AM to noon) followed by 20 hours of fasting 3 days per week and eat as desired on the other days; daily calorie restriction to 70% of requirements; or standard weight loss advice.

The IF plus early time-restricted eating intervention was associated with a significant improvement in a key measure of glucose control versus calorie restriction at 6 months, while both interventions were linked to benefits in terms of cardiovascular risk markers and body composition, compared with the standard weight loss advice.

However, the research, published in Nature Medicine, showed that the additional benefit of IF plus early time-restricted eating did not persist, and less than half of participants were still following the plan at 18 months, compared with almost 80% of those in the calorie-restriction group.

"Following a time-restricted, IF diet could help lower the chances of developing type 2 diabetes," said senior author Leonie K. Heilbronn, PhD, University of Adelaide, South Australia, in a press release.

This is "the largest study in the world to date, and the first powered to assess how the body processes and uses glucose after eating a meal," with the latter being a better indicator of diabetes risk than a fasting glucose test, added first author Xiao Tong Teong, a PhD student, also at the University of Adelaide.

"The results of this study add to the growing body of evidence to indicate that meal timing and fasting advice extends the health benefits of a restricted-calorie diet, independently from weight loss, and this may be influential in clinical practice," Teong added.

Adherence Difficult to IF Plus Early Time-Restricted Eating

Asked to comment, Krista Varady, PhD, said that the study design "would have been stronger if the time-restricted eating and IF interventions were separated" and compared.

"Time-restricted eating has been shown to naturally reduce calorie intake by 300-500 kcal/day," she told Medscape Medical News, "so I'm not sure why the investigators chose to combine [it] with IF. It...defeats the point of time-restricted eating."

Varady, who recently coauthored a review of the clinical application of intermittent fasting for weight loss, also doubted whether individuals would adhere to combined early time-restricted eating and IF. "In all honesty, I don't think anyone would follow this diet for very long," she said.

She added that the feasibility of this particular approach is "very questionable. In general, people don't like diets that require them to skip dinner with family/friends on multiple days of the week," explained Varady, professor of nutrition at the University of Illinois, Chicago.  "These regimens make social eating very difficult, which results in high attrition."

"Indeed, evidence from a recent large-scale observational study of nearly 800,000 adults shows that Americans who engage in time-restricted eating placed their eating window in the afternoon or evening," she noted.

Varady therefore suggested that future trials should test "more feasible time-restricted eating approaches," such as those with later eating windows and without "vigilant calorie monitoring."

"These types of diets are much easier to follow and are more likely to produce lasting weight and glycemic control in people with obesity and prediabetes," she observed.

A Novel Way to Cut Calories? 

The Australian authors say there is growing interest in extending the established health benefits of calorie restriction through new approaches such as timing of meals and prolonged fasting, with IF — defined as fasting interspersed with days of ad libitum eating — gaining in popularity as an alternative to simple calorie restriction.

Time-restricted eating, which emphasizes shorter daily eating windows in alignment with circadian rhythms, has also become popular in recent years, although the authors acknowledge that current evidence suggests any benefits over calorie restriction alone in terms of body composition, blood lipids, or glucose parameters are small.

To examine the combination of IF plus early time-restricted eating, in the direct trial, the team recruited individuals aged 35-75 years who had a score of at least 12 on the Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool but did not have a diagnosis of diabetes and had stable weight for more than 6 months prior to study entry.

The participants were randomized to one of three groups:IF plus early time-restricted eating, which allowed consumption of 30% of calculated baseline energy requirements between 8:00 AM and midday, followed by a 20-hour fast from midday on 3 nonconsecutive days per week. They consumed their regular diet on nonfasting days.Calorie restriction, where they consumed 70% of daily calculated baseline energy requirements each day and were given rotating menu plans, but no specific mealtimes.Standard care, where they were given a booklet on current guidelines, with no counseling or meal replacement.

There were clinic visits every 2 weeks for the first 6 months of follow-up, and then monthly visits for 12 months. The two intervention groups had one-on-one diet counseling for the first 6 months. All groups were instructed to maintain their usual physical activity levels.

Two hundred and nine individuals were enrolled between September 26, 2018 and May 4, 2020. Their mean age was 58 years, and 57% were women. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 34.8 kg/m2.

In all, 40.7% of participants were allocated to IF plus early time-restricted eating, 39.7% to calorie restriction, and the remaining 19.6% to standard care.

The results showed that IF plus early time-restricted eating was associated with a significantly greater improvement in the primary outcome of postprandial glucose area under the curve (AUC) at month 6 compared with calorie restriction, at –10.1 mg/dL/min versus –3.6 mg/dL/min (P = .03).

"To our knowledge, no [prior] studies have been powered for postprandial assessments of glycemia, which are better indicators of diabetes risk than fasting assessment," the authors underline.

IF plus early time-restricted eating was also associated with greater reductions in postprandial insulin AUC versus calorie restriction at 6 months (P = .04). However, the differences between the IF plus early time-restricted eating and calorie restriction groups for postmeal insulin did not remain significant at 18 months of follow-up.

Both IF plus early time-restricted eating and calorie restriction were associated with greater reductions in A1c levels at 6 months versus standard care, but there was no significant difference between the two active interventions (P = .46).

Both interventions were also associated with improvements in markers of cardiovascular risk versus standard care, such as systolic blood pressure at 2 months, diastolic blood pressure at 6 months, and fasting triglycerides at both time points, with no significant differences between the two intervention groups.

IF plus early time-restricted eating and calorie restriction were also both associated with greater reductions in BMI and fat mass in the first 6 months, as well as in waist circumference.

Calorie Restriction Easier to Stick to, Less Likely to Cause Fatigue 

When offered the chance to modify their diet plan at 6 months, 46% of participants in the IF plus early time-restricted eating group said they would maintain 3 days of restrictions per week, while 51% chose to reduce the restrictions to 2 days per week.

In contrast, 97% of those who completed the calorie-restriction plan indicated they would continue with their current diet plan.

At 18 months, 42% of participants in the IF plus early time-restricted eating group said they still undertook 2 to 3 days of restrictions per week, while 78% of those assigned to calorie restriction reported that they followed a calorie-restricted diet.

Fatigue was more common with IF plus early time-restricted eating, reported by 56% of participants versus 37% of those following calorie restriction, and 35% of those in the standard care group at 6 months. Headaches and constipation were more common in the intervention groups than with standard care.

The study was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant, an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship from the University of Adelaide, and a Diabetes Australia Research Program Grant.

No relevant financial relationships were declared.

Nat Med. Published online April 6, 2023. Full text