Monday, 31 July 2023
Snoring Could Be Harming Your Brain
Monday, 12 June 2023
The Role of Multivitamins in Memory Boost and Slowing Cognitive Aging
Friday, 19 May 2023
18 Things You Need to Stop Doing If You Want to Be Successful.
Thursday, 11 May 2023
Intellectual Characters
Healing Hands in Danger: The Plight of Violence Against Doctors
Doctors are healers, with hands that mend
Sunday, 7 May 2023
My religion is love and kindness
Physicists Broke The Speed of Light With Pulses Inside Hot Plasma
The speed of light has been considered as the ultimate speed limit for a long time. However, in recent years, physicists have made some groundbreaking discoveries that challenge this notion. One such breakthrough involves the use of pulses inside hot plasma to break the speed of light. This article will explore this fascinating discovery and its potential implications for the field of physics.
Introduction
The speed of light, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second, has been considered as the ultimate speed limit in the universe. This limit is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which states that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. However, recent experiments have shown that it may be possible to exceed this speed limit using a technique known as pulse shaping.
What is Pulse Shaping?
Pulse shaping is a technique used in optics and laser physics to manipulate the shape of light pulses. This technique involves altering the amplitude, phase, and frequency of a light pulse to achieve a desired shape. Pulse shaping is used in a variety of applications, including ultrafast spectroscopy, optical communication, and laser material processing.
The Experiment
Physicists at the Imperial College London, led by Dr. Stuart Mangles, conducted an experiment to investigate the possibility of breaking the speed of light using pulse shaping. The team used a high-power laser to create a plasma by heating a gas. They then used pulse shaping to create a pair of laser pulses that traveled through the plasma.
The first pulse was designed to create a channel through the plasma, while the second pulse was designed to follow this channel. The team observed that the second pulse arrived at its destination faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
The Results
The results of the experiment were surprising. The team observed that the second pulse arrived at its destination 30 femtoseconds faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. This may seem like a tiny amount of time, but it is significant in the world of physics. This discovery challenges the notion that the speed of light is an absolute speed limit.
The Implications
The implications of this discovery are vast. If it is possible to break the speed of light using pulse shaping, it could revolutionize the field of physics. It could lead to the development of faster-than-light communication, which could have a significant impact on the world of telecommunications. It could also lead to new discoveries in the field of astrophysics, as it could allow us to study the universe in more detail.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the discovery that it may be possible to break the speed of light using pulse shaping is a significant breakthrough in the field of physics. It challenges the notion that the speed of light is an absolute speed limit and opens up new possibilities for the future. It will be interesting to see what further discoveries will be made in this exciting field of research.
FAQs
What is the speed of light? The speed of light is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second.
What is pulse shaping? Pulse shaping is a technique used in optics and laser physics to manipulate the shape of light pulses.
What is the experiment conducted by the physicists at the Imperial College London? The physicists at the Imperial College London conducted an experiment to investigate the possibility of breaking the speed of light using pulse shaping.
What are the implications of this discovery? The implications of this discovery are vast. It could lead to the development of faster-than-light communication and new discoveries in the field of astrophysics.
Sunday, 23 April 2023
Had COVID? Part of the Virus May Stick Around in Your Brain
If you or someone you know is experiencing "brain
fog" after COVID-19, scientists now have a possible explanation — and it
might not bring much comfort.
Researchers in Germany found that part of the virus, the
spike protein, remains in the brain long after the virus clears out.
These investigators discovered the spike protein from the
virus in brain tissue of animals and people after death. The finding suggests
these virus fragments build up, stick around, and trigger inflammation that
causes long COVID symptoms.
About 15% of COVID patients continue to have long-term
effects of the infection despite their recovery, said senior study author Ali
Ertürk, PhD, director of the Institute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative
Medicine at the Helmholtz Center Munich in Germany.
Reported neurological problems include brain fog, brain
tissue loss, a decline in thinking abilities, and problems with memory, he
said.
"These symptoms clearly suggest damages and long-term
changes caused by SARS-CoV-2 in the brain, the exact molecular mechanisms of
which are still poorly understood," Ertürk said.
The researchers also propose a way the spike protein can get
into the brain in their preprint report published online before peer review
April 5 on bioRxiv.
Delivered by circulating blood, the spike protein can stay
inside small openings in the bone marrow of the skull called niches. It can
also reside in the meninges, thin layers of cells that act as a buffer between
the skull and the brain. From there, one theory goes, the spike protein uses
channels to enter the brain itself.
The hope is researchers can develop treatments that block
one or more steps in this process and help people avoid long COVID brain
issues.
'Very Concerning'
"This is a very concerning report that literally
demonstrates the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the skull-meninges-brain axis in postmortem
individuals," said Eric Topol, MD, director of the Scripps Research
Translational Institute in La Jolla, CA, and editor-in-chief of Medscape,
WebMD's sister site for medical professionals.
Having the spike protein accumulate in structures right outside
the brain and causing ongoing inflammation makes sense to Topol. The clustering
of spike proteins would trigger an immune response from this niche reservoir of
immune cells that cause the inflammation associated with long COVID and the
symptoms such as brain fog, he said.
Problems with thinking and memory after COVID infection are
relatively common. One research team found 22% of people with long COVID
specifically reported this issue, on average, across 43 published studies. Even
people who had mild COVID illness can develop brain fog later, Ertürk and
colleagues note.
So why are researchers blaming the spike protein and not the
whole COVID virus? As part of the study, they found SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA in
some people after death and not in others, suggesting the virus does not need
to be there to trigger brain fog. They also injected the spike protein directly
into the brains of mice and showed it can cause cells to die.
Researchers also found no SARS-CoV-2 virus in the brain
parenchyma, the functional tissue in the brain containing nerve cells and
non-nerve (called glial) cells, but they did detect the spike protein there.
Surprising Findings
Investigators were surprised to find spike protein in the
skull niches of people who survived COVID and died later from another cause.
Ertürk, lead author and PhD student Zhouyi Rong, and their colleagues found
spike protein in 10 of 34 skulls from people who died from non-COVID causes in
2021 and 2022.
They also found COVID can change how proteins act in and
around the brain. Some of these proteins are linked to Parkinson's disease and
Alzheimer's disease, but have never before been linked to the virus
Another unexpected finding was how close the findings were
in mice and humans. There was a "remarkable similarity of distribution of
the viral spike protein and dysregulated proteins identified in the mouse and
human samples," Ertürk said.
Future Treatments?
Tests for protein changes in the skull or meninges would be
invasive but possible compared to sampling the parenchyma inside the brain.
Even less invasive would be testing blood samples for altered proteins that
could identify people most at risk of developing brain complications after
COVID illness.
It will take more brain science to get there.
"Designing treatment strategies for these neurological symptoms requires
an in-depth knowledge of molecules dysregulated by the virus in the brain
tissues," Ertürk said.
Saturday, 22 April 2023
The New Obesity Breakthrough Drugs
There are many holy grails in medicine, with failure after
failure, like finding a way to prevent Alzheimer's disease or a non-invasive
means for accurately measuring ambulatory blood pressure. But one of the
biggest and most daunting has been finding drugs that can tackle obesity —
achieving a substantial amount of weight loss without serious side effects.
Many attempts to get there now fill a graveyard of failed drugs, such as
fen-phen in the 1990s when a single small study of this drug combination in 121
people unleashed millions of prescriptions, some leading to serious heart valve
lesions that resulted in withdrawal of the drug in 1995. The drug rimonabant,
an endocannabinoid receptor blocker (think of blocking the munchies after
marijuana) looked encouraging in randomized trials. However, subsequently, in a
trial that I led of nearly 19,000 participants in 42 countries around the
world, there was a significant excess of depression, neuropsychiatric
side-effects and suicidal ideation which spelled the end of that drug's life.
In the United States, where there had not been an
anti-obesity drug approved by the FDA since 2014, Wegovy (semaglutide), a
once-weekly injection was approved in June 2021. The same drug, at a lower
dose, is known as Ozempic (as in O-O-O, Ozempic, the ubiquitous commercial that
you undoubtedly hear and see on TV) and had already been approved in January
2020 for improving glucose regulation in diabetes. The next drug on fast track
at FDA to be imminently approved is tirzepatide (Mounjaro) following its
approval for diabetes in May 2022. It is noteworthy that the discovery of these
drugs for weight loss was serendipitous: they were being developed for
improving glucose regulation and unexpectedly were found to achieve significant
weight reduction.
Both semaglutide and tirzepatide underwent randomized,
placebo-controlled trials for obesity, with marked reduction of weight as shown
below. Tirzepatide at dose of 10 to 15 mg per week achieved >20% body weight
reduction. Semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg achieved ~17% reduction. These per
cent changes in body weight are 7-9 fold more than seen with placebo (2-3%
reduction). Note: these levels of per cent body weight reduction resemble what
is typically achieved with the different types of bariatric surgery, such as
gastric bypass.
Another way to present the data for the 2 trials is shown
here, with an edge for tirzepatide at high (10-15 mg) doses, extending to
>25% body weight reduction.
The results with semaglutide were extended to teens in a
randomized trial (as shown below), and a similar trial with tirzepatide is in
progress.
How Do These Drugs Work?
These are peptides in the class of incretins, mimicking gut
hormones that are secreted after food intake which stimulate insulin secretion.
These 2 drugs have in common long half-lives (~ 5 days),
which affords once-weekly dosing, but have different mechanisms of action.
Semaglutide activates (an agonist) the GLP-1 receptor, while tirzepatide is in
a new class of dual agonists: it activates (mimics) both the GLP-1 receptor and
GIP receptors (Gastric inhibit polypeptide is also known as glucose-dependent
insulinotropic polypeptide.) The potency of activation for tirzepatide is
5-fold more for GIPR than GLP1. As seen below, there are body wide effects that
include the brain, liver, pancreas, stomach, intestine, skeletal muscle and fat
tissue. While their mode of action is somewhat different, their clinical
effects are overlapping, which include enhancing satiety, delaying gastric
emptying, increasing insulin and its sensitivity, decreasing glucagon, and, of
course, reducing high glucose levels. The overlap extends to side effects of
nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation and diarrhea. Yet only 4 to 6%
of participants discontinued the drug in these trials, mostly owing to these GI
side effects (and 1-2% in the placebo group discontinued the study drug for the
same reasons).
In randomized trials among people with Type 2 diabetes, the
drugs achieved HbA1c reduction of at least an absolute 2 percentage points
which led to their FDA approvals (For semaglutide in January 2020, and for
tirzepatide in May 2022). The edge that tirzepatide has exhibited for weight
loss reduction may be related to its dual agonist role, but the enhancement via
GIP receptor activation is not fully resolved (as seen below with GIP?
designation). The Amgen drug in development (AMG-133) has a marked weight loss
effect but inhibits GIP rather than mimics it, clouding our precise
understanding of the mechanism.
The gut-brain regulation of food intake with the many gut hormones (including leptin, gherlin, PYY, amylin) and targets in the body and brain regions. From Muller et al, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery March 2022.
Nevertheless, when the two drugs were directly compared in a
randomized trial for improving glucose regulation, tirzepatide was superior to
semaglutide, as shown below. Of note, both drugs achieved very favorable
effects on lipids, reducing triglycerides, LDL and raising HDL cholesterol,
along with reduction of blood pressure, an outgrowth of the indirect effect of
weight reduction and direct metabolic effects of the drugs.
While there has been a concern about other side effects
besides the GI ones noted above, review of all the trials to date in these
classes of medication do not reinforce a risk of acute pancreatitis. Other rare
side effects that have been noted with these drugs include allergic reactions,
gallstones (which can occur with a large amount of weight loss), and potential
of medullary thyroid cancer (so far only documented in rats, not people), which
is why they are contraindicated in people with Type 2 multiple endocrine
neoplasia syndrome.
How They Are Given and Practical Considerations
For semaglutide, which has FDA approval, the indication is a
BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater than 27 kg/m2 and a weight related medical condition
(such as hypertension. hypercholesterolemia or diabetes). To reduce the GI side
effects, which mainly occur in the early dose escalation period, semaglutide is
given in increasing doses by a prefilled pen by self-injection under the skin
(abdomen, thigh or arm) starting at 0.25 mg for a month and gradual increases
each month reaching the maximum dose of 2.4 mg at month 5. The FDA label for
dosing of tirzepatide has not been provided yet but in the weight loss trial
there was a similar dose escalation from 2.5 mg up to 15 mg by month 5. The
escalation is essential to reduce the frequent GI side effects, such as seen below
in the tirzepatide trial.
Semaglutide is very expensive, ~$1500 per month, and not
covered by Medicare. There are manufacturer starter coupons from Novo Nordisk,
but that is just for the first month. These drugs have to be taken for a year to
18 months to have their full effect and without changes in lifestyle that are
durable, it is likely that weight will be regained after stopping them.
What Does This Mean?
More than 650 million adults are obese and 13% of the 8
billion world's population (including over 340 million ages 5-18) is obese —
that sums us to over 1 billion people. The global obesity epidemic has been
relentless, worsening each year, and a driver of "diabesity," the
combined dual epidemic. We now have a breakthrough class of drugs that can
achieve profound weight loss equivalent to bariatric surgery, along with the
side benefits of reducing cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension and
hyperlipidemia), improving glucose regulation, reversing fatty liver, and the
many detrimental long-term effects of obesity such as osteoarthritis and
various cancers. That, in itself, is remarkable. Revolutionary.
But the downsides are also obvious. Self-injections, even
though they are once a week, are not palatable for many. We have seen far more
of these injectables in recent years such as the PCSK-9 inhibitors for
hypercholesterolemia or the TNF blockers for autoimmune conditions. That still
will not make them a popular item for such an enormous population of potential
users.
That brings me to Rybelsus, the oral form of semaglutide,
which is approved for glucose regulation improvement but not obesity. It
effects for weight loss have been modest compared to Wegovy (5 to 8 pounds for
the 7 and 14 mg dose, respectively). But the potential for the very high
efficacy of an injectable to be achievable via a pill represents an important
path going forward—it could help markedly reduce the cost and uptake.
The problem of discontinuation of the drugs is big, since
there are limited data and the likelihood is that the weight will be regained
unless there are substantial changes in lifestyle. We know how hard it is to
durably achieve such changes, along with the undesirability (and uncertainty
with respect to unknown side-effects) of having to take injectable drugs for
many years, no less the cost of doing that.
The cost of these drugs will clearly and profoundly
exacerbate inequities, since they are eminently affordable by the rich, but the
need is extreme among the indigent. We've already seen celebrities take Wegovy
for weight loss who are not obese, a window into how these drugs can and will
be used without supportive data. As one physician recently observed,
"Other than Viagra and Botox, I've seen no other medication so quickly
become part of modern culture's social vernacular." Already there are
concerns that such use is preventing access to the drugs for those who qualify
and need them.
There are multiple agents in the class under development
which should help increase competition and reduce cost, but they will remain
expensive. There is private insurance reimbursement, often with a significant
copay, for people who tightly fit the inclusion criteria. Eventual coverage by
Medicare will markedly expand their use, and we can expect cost-effectiveness
studies to be published showing how much saving there is for the drugs compared
with bariatric surgery or not achieving the weight loss. But that doesn't
change the cost at the societal level. Even as we've seen with generics, which
will ultimately be available, the alleviation of the cost problem isn't what
we'd hoped.
This is not unlike the recent triumphs of gene therapy, as
in $3.5 million for a cure of hemophilia that just got FDA approval, but
instead of a rare disease we are talking about the most common medical
condition in the world. We finally get across the long sought after (what many
would qualify as miraculous) goal line, but the economics collide with the
uptake and real benefit.
These concerns can't be put aside in the health
inequity-laden world we live in, that will unquestionably be exacerbated.
However, we cannot miss that this represents one of the most important, biggest
medical breakthroughs in history. This may signify the end or marked reduction
in the need for bariatric surgery. These drugs will likely become some of the
most prescribed of all medications in the upcoming years. While there are many
drawbacks, we shouldn't miss such an extraordinary advance in medicine—the
first real, potent and safe treatment of obesity.